This report analyzes how Better Buying’s Responsible Purchasing Practices surveys align with two widely used industry due diligence frameworks: the Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices (CFRPP) and the Purchasing Practices Human Rights Due Diligence (PP-DD) Framework.
New analysis shows over 60 percent alignment between Cascale Better Buying survey data and leading due diligence frameworks.
Amsterdam, Hong Kong, Oakland (CA) – February 11, 2026: Cascale Better Buying has released Mapping Cascale Better Buying Responsible Purchasing Practices Survey Questions to the CFRPP and PP-DD Frameworks analyzing how its Responsible Purchasing Practices surveys align with two widely used industry due diligence frameworks: the Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices (CFRPP) and the Purchasing Practices Human Rights Due Diligence (PP-DD) Framework.
The analysis maps supplier feedback captured through Better Buying tools against each framework’s requirements to better understand where responsible purchasing and human rights due diligence expectations are already reflected, where additional coverage can be achieved through existing services, and where targeted refinements could further strengthen alignment. The report also identifies areas that fall outside Better Buying’s core focus or practices that suppliers cannot reasonably observe.
“Our goal was to bring greater clarity to how supplier-reported data can support responsible purchasing and human rights due diligence efforts,” said Katie Hess, head of product at Cascale Better Buying. “This mapping shows that supplier feedback already provides meaningful insight into many core practices, and it highlights practical ways companies can strengthen alignment without adding unnecessary complexity.”
Mapping to the CFRPP
The CFRPP was developed in 2022 by a working group of multi-stakeholder initiatives as a shared reference point for companies and supporting organizations to understand and improve responsible purchasing practices in supply chains. Better Buying Institute, whose assets were acquired by Cascale in 2025, was consulted during the development process and contributed input as part of the broader stakeholder consultation and benchmarking process.
Mapping the Cascale Better Buying survey questions to the CFRPP revealed:
Mapping to the PP-DD Framework
The PP-DD Framework was developed by the Responsible Purchasing Practices Working Group, a coalition of multi-stakeholder organizations working to advance responsible purchasing and human rights due diligence in global supply chains. The PP-DD Framework defines the core actions companies should be accountable for when aligning purchasing practices with human rights due diligence expectations.
Mapping the Cascale Better Buying survey questions to the PP-DD Framework revealed:
Summary
Together, the findings demonstrate how supplier voice data can support responsible purchasing practices and human rights due diligence when used alongside established frameworks. The report reinforces Cascale Better Buying’s role in helping companies understand where they are today and where practical improvements can be made to support decent work through more responsible purchasing.
Media Contact: Forster Communications, cascaleforster@forster.co.uk
New softgoods data from Cascale’s Better Buying 2025 survey shows gains in buyer-supplier partnerships, plus areas for improvement.
Amsterdam, Hong Kong, Oakland (CA) – January 30, 2026: Cascale today released the Better Buying Responsible Purchasing Practices Snapshot Survey 2025 Report (formerly the Better Buying Partnership Index), offering a data-driven view of how suppliers experience buyers’ purchasing practices across the apparel supply chain. The report draws on findings from the fifth annual Better Buying Partnership Index (BBPI) rating cycle and amplifies anonymized supplier feedback to highlight what is working and where improvement is still needed.
The report focuses exclusively on softgoods, reflecting 974 supplier ratings collected from 51 countries and regions between October 1 and November 7, 2025. China, Bangladesh, and India accounted for the largest share of softgoods ratings, with 920 softgoods responses included in the analysis.
“This report shows that responsible purchasing practices are improving, but also that progress depends on listening closely to suppliers and acting on what they tell us,” said Katie Hess, Head of Product at Cascale’s Better Buying. “Suppliers are clear about what enables strong partnerships: predictable planning, fair terms, and consistent communication. When buyers embed these practices, they create more resilient supply chains and better outcomes for workers, businesses, and the environment.”
Based on anonymized, open-ended responses from the 2025 survey, suppliers consistently highlighted the following themes as critical to strong, mutually beneficial buyer–supplier relationships.
Cascale encourages brands and retailers to use the findings as a practical benchmark to assess their own purchasing practices and identify areas for targeted improvement.
The Better Buying Snapshot Survey is part of Cascale’s broader commitment to advancing responsible purchasing practices as a foundational lever for decent work, environmental performance, and long-term supply chain resilience. Cascale will continue to support brands and manufacturers in using Better Buying data alongside other tools and programs to drive measurable, collaborative progress.
This report offers a data-driven view of how suppliers experience buyers’ purchasing practices across the apparel supply chain. It draws on findings from the fifth annual Better Buying Partnership Index (BBPI) rating cycle and amplifies anonymized supplier feedback to highlight what is working and where improvement is still needed.
Cascale convened industry leaders to explore BBPPI 2025 insights, highlighting shared responsibility between brands and suppliers amid global market volatility.
Cascale recently played a convening role in a jointly produced webinar with Innovation Forum, “Better Buying 2025 Insights: Navigating Global Volatility and Defining the Next Steps for Better Purchasing Practices.”
The December virtual event brought together more than 250 executives and supply chain leaders from across the consumer goods industry to examine how responsible purchasing practices can be strengthened amid ongoing market uncertainty.
Grounded in both data and real-time industry feedback, the webinar underscored the need for shared responsibility between brands and suppliers, and the interdependent roles each plays in planning, sourcing, and purchasing decisions that directly shape environmental and social outcomes.
To set the stage, Katie Hess, head of product at Cascale’s Better Buying, delivered key insights on the Better Buying Purchasing Practices Index (BBPPI) 2025. The survey is free to complete and maps anonymous supplier feedback across seven key indicators.
Hess highlighted how global pressures — including tariffs and fluctuating demand — are placing significant strain on purchasing processes, with the steepest declines seen in planning and forecasting. Supplier experiences, she noted, vary widely depending on buyer practices, sourcing contexts, and regional dynamics.
She emphasized that BBPPI is not intended as a static benchmark, adding: “When brands actually use the data with their suppliers, behaviors and outcomes change.”
Hess also reinforced communication as a recurring theme across Better Buying surveys, stressing that purchasing practices must be treated as a core business priority, not solely as a CSR initiative.
Following the data presentation, a panel of experts joined to discuss perspectives on the findings, while identifying areas for improvement.
Speakers included Mobeen Ahmed Chughtai, group head of CSR and corporate communications at Soorty Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.; Naurin Muzaffar, lead advisor sustainability strategy, operations, and transparency at Crescent Bahuman Ltd.; and Susan Scow, sustainability impact specialist at Eileen Fisher, Inc. As moderator, Tanya Richard, chief operating officer and head of stakeholder engagement at Innovation Forum, guided the discussion.
Scow highlighted the value of long-term supplier relationships, noting that Eileen Fisher’s average supplier partnership spans approximately eight years, with some relationships extending beyond 25 years. She shared how Better Buying data can inform product development and logistics decisions — such as shifting freight from air to sea — and pointed to the benefits of supplier-driven initiatives through Cascale’s Manufacturer Climate Action Program (MCAP).
From the supplier perspective, Chughtai spoke candidly about the risks suppliers face when sharing feedback, noting their frequent fear of repercussions for speaking out. He emphasized the importance of suppliers being able to set boundaries and engage in honest dialogue with brand partners.
Muzaffar echoed these challenges, describing a “state of confusion” driven by paused orders and limited visibility that undermines planning. She also raised critical questions around growing regulatory demands and lagging progress on environmental and social goals.
Across perspectives, speakers aligned on the importance of clear communication, trust, and supplier inclusion. The webinar reinforced both the relevance of Better Buying insights and Cascale’s convening power.
During the era of tariffs, BBPPI 2025 data shows repeat subscribers see greater resilience, yet progress is still uneven across a range of criteria. See how supplier regions weigh in.
This year’s Better Buying Purchasing Practices Index (BBPPI) collected data from suppliers in the 12 months leading up to April 2025, the latter part of which coincided with the introduction of the U.S. trade tariffs.
The findings reveal notable variations in how suppliers are experiencing purchasing practices across the value chain, portraying uneven progress on responsible purchasing on the part of global brands and retailers.
Suppliers in North America are struggling to get paid for orders, which is negatively affecting their cash flow and sustainability. But on the plus side, they are reporting better, more accurate and timely forecasts from their suppliers.
In the APAC region, suppliers reported fewer issues with payment and terms but reported weaker design and development practices on the part of their buyer customers. This is in part because of too few samples being converted into orders – wasting valuable time and resources.
These mixed experiences suggest that progress on responsible purchasing is uneven. They are likely due to a combination of factors – they may be as much about the types of product buyers are sourcing and the partnership models they adopt with their suppliers as they are to geography and geopolitical unrest. But they underscore the need for companies to take a more consistent, systems-based approach to improving purchasing practices and embedding fair and predictable working relationships throughout their supply chains.
Companies benefit hugely from understanding how suppliers’ experiences of their purchasing practices are shaped by local contexts and business environments, and can learn from higher-performing regions. Thus, they can act accordingly, directing support to those facing persistent challenges for a more balanced and sustainable global supply chain. Those that actively subscribe with Better Buying receive confidential scores and reports, with detailed, granular data specific to their own business, and recommendations as to how they can make improvements, working with their suppliers to co-create solutions to shared business challenges.
Back in 2021, Better Buying collected data from suppliers during the Covid-19 pandemic, and expected to see big falls in the scores awarded to buyers. We were surprised to see that companies that had subscribed with the surveys year over year had still managed to make some improvements, even during this difficult time. The BBPPI data shows that the same is largely true during the era of tariffs. While both the overall and category scores have fallen slightly, those companies that have subscribed with Better Buying year over year have continued to make improvements. Three companies in particular have made big improvements, including one that increased its overall score by 10 points between 2023 and 2025.
Companies that are serious about human rights due diligence have a platform that enables their suppliers to share their experiences anonymously, giving buyer companies access to deep, granular insights that they can use, in partnership with their suppliers, to build region-specific, targeted strategies for future-proofing their supply chains.
To find out about how to subscribe for the 2026 BBPI, contact Leonie Abraham, vice president of business development, Cascale Better Buying. For a deeper dive on this data, join us for the “Better Buying 2025 Insights: Navigating global volatility and defining the next steps for better purchasing practices” webinar on December 9 with Innovation Forum.
Discover how the 2025 Better Buying Purchasing Practices Index reveals new insights on resilience, responsible purchasing, and supplier partnerships amid global trade tensions.
The Blessing in Disguise (BiD) Hypothesis encourages us to see challenges as opportunities in disguise and reframe perceived threats as chances for growth, innovation, transformation, and change.
Cascale’s 2025 Better Buying Purchasing Practices Index (BBPPI), published earlier this month, suggests that this may indeed be the case, and that even amid the toughest of geopolitical and trading contexts, brands and supplier companies can work together across the value chain to adopt purchasing practices that ensure fairness, resilience, and shared success.
Data collected for the BBPPI back in 2021 — just as suppliers were emerging, shell-shocked and bruised from the COVID-19 pandemic — revealed some interesting insights. We had expected the scores to take a real beating. But that wasn’t what happened. In fact, the data revealed that companies that had subscribed with Better Buying for two or more rating cycles had continued to improve their purchasing practices, despite the unprecedented shock of COVID.
Buyers who had begun improving their purchasing practices before the pandemic could draw on critical building blocks that helped them weather the storm. They talked to their suppliers. They knew their strengths and weaknesses thanks to the data and insights they had collected through the Better Buying surveys. And they were using that data to partner with their suppliers to co-create solutions to the challenges of COVID, making resilience a joint achievement.
At the time, Better Buying predicted that in the event of any future shocks and disruptions, it would be those companies, with inbuilt business resilience and strong supplier partnerships, that emerged competitively afterwards.
So were we right? Fast forward five years, to the 2025 BBPPI rating cycle, and we see new patterns emerging. Under the BBPPI, we confidentially collected data and insights from suppliers during a period of unprecedented geopolitical tension and uncertainty — much of it stemming from U.S.-imposed tariffs.
As in 2021, this new stress-test environment for purchasing exposed weaknesses where resilient practices are not yet institutionalized. The overall industry score was down one point, and most category scores edged lower. This was especially true in the critical area of Planning & Forecasting, down three points from last year — highlighting ongoing challenges in forecast timeliness and accuracy. (Planning & Forecasting is one of seven responsible purchasing practices Better Buying identifies in its ratings cycle). Overall, buyers’ efforts to improve have been limited, and global tensions and tariffs may have further weakened performance.
And yet, as before, that’s not the whole story. Just as we saw during COVID, there are still some buyers – those with stronger processes in place – who have either sustained or improved their performance, indicating that when it comes to responsible purchasing, it’s the quality of buyers’ practices, rather than macro shocks alone, that determines outcomes.
Three Better Buying subscribers in particular were selected for closer analysis this year. Each has participated in the last three BBPPI rating cycles (2023-2025). Not only did they all outperform the soft goods industry average — despite industry-wide declines in almost all purchasing practices categories this year — one company even achieved an impressive 10 percent improvement in its overall score over the period. All three also demonstrated consistent year-on-year performance improvements.
So what did they do right?
One common feature was relatively high performance in Planning and Forecasting — a key driver of decent work, and the category consistently cited by suppliers as the most important area for buyers to focus their improvement efforts. Another was above-the-benchmark performance in relation to sample adoption rates. Suppliers underscored how good practices in these areas enabled them to manage capacity, invest in their workforce, and reduce waste.
Taken individually, each company had particular strengths. Almost all of one company’s suppliers reported that all orders were placed for fully compliant production. Another excelled at providing consistent, predictable monthly order volumes. The third was praised by suppliers for using fair financials, including advance payments and favorable terms.
These insights prove improvement can be achieved. But for lasting, transformational change, it can’t be just a few companies doing this in isolation. In the seven years since Better Buying began collecting supplier data, the number of participating companies has not grown enough to drive industry-wide change. But Better Buying is now part of Cascale, with 300+ members, presenting a once-in-a-generation opportunity to move the needle.
But how do we make that happen?
One barrier to progress has been fragmented leadership across the value chain. Brand and retailer CEOs must step forward with clear commitments, while suppliers must have meaningful opportunities to shape strategy and show how fairer practices deliver stronger business results.
At a recent panel of C-suite executives from both big brands and leading manufacturers held at Cascale’s Annual Meeting in Hong Kong, calls were made for tangible benchmarks to secure C-suite commitment, and for more opportunities for brand CEOs to actually visit the factory floors and engage directly with manufacturers who make their goods.
It’s highly likely that we will see more tariffs introduced next year, with suppliers facing heightened risks. If we are to survive these urgent threats and realize the opportunities amid the turmoil, CEOs and C-suite executives must recognize and act on the priority role their suppliers play in driving responsible purchasing, as both a mutual business imperative and a shared responsibility across the value chain.
Companies interested in onboarding for the BBPPI 2026 rating cycle should contact Leonie Abraham, Director of Business Development, Better Buying.
Each year, Cascale Better Buying produces a special report for the Social & Labor Convergence Program (SLCP), capturing year-over-year progress on audit harmonization.
This Cascale Better Buying report for SLCP showcases how Better Buying data informs a Win-Win Sustainable Partnership, highlighting factors such as audit harmonization. Audit harmonization is a top priority among partners such as Better Buying and the Social & Labor Convergence Program (SLCP).
Purchasing practices performance in Apparel, Footwear and Household Textile Supply Chains.
