
Sustainable Textile Policy Landscape, Legislation to Watch in 2026
Cascale’s Elisabeth von Reitzenstein and Textile Exchange’s Romane Malysza presented priorities for the Sustainable Textiles Working Group at the European Parliament.

European textile policy has been dotted with fragmented efforts amid sweeping reform attempts. Yet, progress is happening in strides.
To promote and advance circularity and sustainability in textiles and consumer goods, the European Parliament launched the Sustainable Textile Working Group last year. The group comprises about 30 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), including founding members Saskia Bricmont (Greens, BE), Barry Andrews (Renew, IE), and Lara Wolters (S&D, NL). It also includes civil society groups such as the Changing Markets Foundation, Fair Trade Advocacy Office, ECOS, IndustriAll Europe, and Fashion Revolution. The informal cross-party group of MEPs is working to support the implementation of the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles.
Recently, Cascale and Textile Exchange presented our work and key findings to the group in a structured dialogue at the European Parliament. Collaborating often, both of our public affairs teams strive to inform EU policy-making on sustainability, circularity, and environmental frameworks for the entire apparel, textile, and fashion industry.
For the benefit of the public and members, we outlined targeted actions needed today to establish European legislation as a key driver of clarity, credibility, and measurable progress in our sector in 2026 and beyond.
Textile Labelling Regulation: Consistency Builds Trust
Cascale and Textile Exchange welcome and strongly support the EU Commission’s intention to revise the EU Textile Labelling Regulation.
Clear, consistent labelling is essential for credible sustainability claims. Divergent methodologies risk confusing consumers, slowing innovation, and increasing compliance costs.
Aligning labelling with science-based methods and clear terminology strengthens trust, supports novel fiber adoption, and gives companies predictable rules for long-term investment.
Recent years have seen a rapid advancement of non-textile materials of non-animal origin used in textile applications. These materials have often been seen as alternatives to conventional animal fibers, such as silk or fur. There is currently no clear guidance on how such materials should be classified and labelled. We believe this gap should be closed and recommend the creation of a distinct category for these materials and to provide a set of clear guidelines on how to name the alternatives. Without it, consumers risk being misled on fiber innovations.
Next Steps: Support alignment with science-based methodologies, establish clear terminology, and create common naming guidelines. This is especially relevant for alternative materials such as non-textile parts of non-animal original, as well as industry testing and feedback loops.
Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation: From Ambition to Coherence
The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) and Digital Product Passport (DPP) can transform sustainability data in textiles. Feasible recycled content targets and interoperable digital systems can increase transparency, reduce duplication, and enable SME participation.
Next Steps: Support requirements for “sustainably sourced renewable materials” (SSRM) as a distinct product aspect for ecodesign requirements in the Delegated Act for Textile Apparel. This will complement upcoming recycled content requirements, and support truly sustainable textile products entering the EU market.
Circular Economy Act: Laying Foundations for Delivery
Circularity needs strong definitions, end-of-waste criteria, and predictable secondary markets. Clear alignment across the Waste Framework Directive, ESPR, and DPP gives companies confidence to invest in circular solutions. Exploring sustainably-sourced renewable materials (SSRM) and recycled content targets are also key here.
Next Steps: Textiles must remain a priority within the Circular Economy Act, reflecting both the sector’s environmental impact and its transformation potential. Textile industry stakeholders and MEPs can support workshops, hearings, and technical briefings on how circularity is a core driver to the industry’s ongoing transformation.
Omnibus I (CSRD & CSDDD): Supporting SMEs While Preserving Visibility
Changes to reporting requirements could create upstream data gaps if applied too restrictively. A pragmatic approach — including clear guidance and meaningful Voluntary Sustainability Reporting Standards for non-listed Small and Medium Enterprises (VSME) baselines — can ensure smaller companies are supported while maintaining multi-tier value chain visibility.
Next Steps: MEPs can secure clarity for economic operators and drive credible environmental and due diligence outcomes through engagement in the legislative process. As a note, Textile Exchange does not engage in the legislative process of the Omnibus I.
For continued guidance and information, please subscribe to public affairs updates from Cascale and Textile Exchange.










